Financial Times MBA Rankings 2010

Financial Times MBA Rankings

Thinking about pursuing an MBA degree? Then take a look at the prestigious Financial Times MBA rankings to determine which MBA schools offer the best business education. The Financial Times MBA rankings 2010 list the best business schools in the world. It is the twelfth year that the Financial Times has published these annual MBA rankings.

Participation Criteria for the Financial Times MBA Rankings 2010

To be eligible for the Financial Times MBA rankings, business schools must be accredited by an international accreditation body, such as Equis, Amba or the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). Furthermore, business schools must offer a full-time MBA program that has been in existence for at least four years and have graduated their first class at least three years ago. In addition, classes must have at least 30 students.

Financial Times Top MBA Programs 2010 in the US

The Financial Times produces five rankings annually that relate to the MBA, EMBA, and Masters in Management, as well as non-degree executive education courses and European business schools. Whether you’re looking for a full-time MBA program or a weeklong course to hone your management skills, the Financial Times rankings can help you find the right program for your needs.

The Financial Times top MBA programs are evaluated based on a wide range of criteria, including value for money, average salary after graduation, and placement rates. The top US business schools in the Financial Times MBA rankings 2010 are as follows:

  1. University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School
  2. Harvard Business School
  3. Stanford Graduate School of Business
  4. Columbia Business School
  5. MIT Sloan School of Management
  6. University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business
  7. Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business
  8. New York University’s Stern School of Business
  9. Yale School of Management
  10. Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business

The methodoloFuqua School of Businessgy of the Financial Times MBA rankings is based on data collected from both alumni and business schools. A total of 156 business schools met the participation criteria for the rankings and completed the survey provided. 21,328 alumni from the graduating class of 2006 were asked to complete a survey, and a little over 8,000 responses were submitted. Financial Times surveys graduates three years after they complete their MBA to determine how the degree has affected their career progression and salary.

The three areas that the Financial Times MBA rankings focus on are the career development and salaries of graduates, the international reach of the school and its MBA program, and the research capabilities of the school. According to the Financial Times, the two most heavily weighted components of their MBA rankings are “Weighted Salary” and “Salary Percentage Increase.” Combined, these two components contribute 40 percent to the final ranking of a school. The salary data of full-time students and alumni who work in the non-profit and public service sectors are excluded.

If you’re seeking a business education that provides you with a global perspective and a comprehensive understanding of world markets, check out the results of the Financial Times MBA rankings 2010. Unlike other influential MBA rankings, the Financial Times MBA rankings focus on MBA programs with an international flair, so they’re a useful resource for anyone considering a career in international business.